28 January 2011

For Jan. 31-Feb. 4

MONDAY
@Reply Slips
A. Report Card
B. Letter re Dates (The one you got from Red)
C. Prom Letter
- you'll receive an NCR for every day late

@Career Talk
10:50-12:00 during Homeroom time
La Salle ang magttalk.

Since there's no Homeroom, I'll collect the slips some time before that para mas madali.

@Prom Invitations
Prom invitations will be given on this day. Don't lose them. They'll serve as your pass [and souvenir]. If you don't have this on that night, you won't get to enjoy the amenities available on that night.

TUESDAY
@Bio
SW: Lateral View of the Brain
This can either be accomplished at home or answered during the discussion

WEDNESDAY
@Physics
LT

THURSDAY
@STR
Critique
-------
Critique of an STR2 Project
Juniors, please visit the GYM, anytime this week to know which project are you assigned for the critique as well as get to know who will be your mentors. You may refer to the posted list of STR2 projects tacked at the bulletin board.

GUIDE QUESTIONS
A. Analysis of the Research Project
1. What is the real life problem being addressed by the project? State your assessment of the plausibility of the real life problem being presented by the researchers.
2. What was the major objective of the researchers? Did it address the RLP?
3. What are minor objectives of the study? Do they contribute to the accomplishment of the major objective? What significance do they play in strengthening the conclusions towards the end of the project execution?
4. Research Design
a. What are the control and experimental setups done in the study? Are they sufficient for coming up with reliable data for the project?
b. What are the independent, dependent and extraneous variables? Are they correctly identified in the research methodology? What other variables, if any, should have been included in the conduct of the research?
c. How was the data gathering procedure done? Are enough quantitative information generated? Were the procedures used for data gathering reliable? What improvements, if any, could be done in the procedure?
5. Are the conclusions made by the researchers reflective of the information generated in the research process? How well did it address the real life problem presented?

B. Presentation of the Project
1. Are the information in the poster enough to be able to understand the project without consulting with the researchers? Identify the good points and the bad points of the poster in terms of content, and suggest ways to improve the contents.
2. Are the ocntents of the poster readable? Identify the good and bad points in terms of visual effects of the poster, and suggest ways to improve the poster.
3. Were the researchers accommodating in answering questions? Did they answer the questions poased satisfactorily?

FORMAT OF SUBMISSION:
Deadline: last meeting of the week following

YMSAT week

Name/s
Section:
Title of Project being critiqued
Group Code

Researchers' Names

CRITIQUE

The critique should be in essay form, using the above as guide questions for the content. Divide the discussions into two major parts (A and B, as stated above). The discussion within each section is free style.

Submission may be handwritten or computerized, but should be 1.5 spaced, 1" margin at all sides and on bond paper of size 8.5x11". A maximum of three (3) pages is allowed.


++
TOR MENTORING PROGRAM
The Third Order Research (TOR) Mentoring Program was designed to enable the Juniors to link up with the seniors and share their experiences and knowledge gained from their respective STR classes.

The Juniors will experience giving a poster presentation to the seniods, while the seniors will have to analyze and evaluate the presentation, as well as the project. Together, the TOR Mentors and the TOR Mentees would examine the project proposal presented, and assess how the basic principles of research design are applied. Suggestions should be made by the Mentors, and shared with the Mentees.

The Seniors should explain their project to the Juniors, and share their experiences to the Juniors as well.

--Requirements here are for the seniors only.

FRIDAY
@SS
To Cs, Na, Sr, Rb, and K, we'll be discussing Northern Renaissance and the Reformation after the YMSAT Week. Please read in advance. Long Quiz on the Renaissance and Reformation will be on Feb 3 and 4. Thank you.

@Bio
Paper on Life's Greatest Miracle
From Beryllium:
Guide Questions
Chapter 1: Passing On Your DNA

1. Why is sexual reproduction more advantageous than cloning?

Chapter 2: The Egg’s Journey

2. Describe the path the egg takes after being released from the ovary.

3. The video states that an egg will survive only a few hours if not fertilized. More recent information suggests that an egg will survive at least 24 hours and perhaps as long as 48 hours if not fertilized. How does that fact influence the most fertile time when couples are attempting to avoid pregnancy using the rhythm method?

Chapter 3: The Sperm’s Journey

4. What kind of obstacles will a sperm encounter once it enters the female?

5. Where in the female reproductive tract does fertilization of the egg occur?

Chapter 4: The First Two Weeks

6. Why would more than 50% of all fertilized eggs not survive? What kind of problems could a fertilized egg encounter?

7. How do identical twins form?

8. How does the blastocyst prevent the mother’s immune system from destroying the developing embryo?

Chapter 5: The Embryo Takes Shape

9. Describe the three layers that develop and include what parts of the body those cell layers will become.

10. How are genes turned on?

Chapter 6: Messages in the Genes

11. Where is the SRY gene found? What does it do? When does it function?

12. How do fingers (and toes) become separated from each other in the developing fetus?

Chapter 7: Feeding the Growing Fetus

13. What is a placenta? What is the function of its villi?

14. Do maternal and fetal blood mix?

Chapter 8: The Third Semester

15. Why is human childbirth so much more dangerous than the birth of other animals?

SATURDAY
@PROM
Reg starts at 5 pm
Programme starts at 7 pm
Whole thing ends at 12 midnight

Your pass [and souvenir] will be the invitation so don't lose it. Losing it would mean you won't get to enjoy the amenities available for that night.

27 January 2011

For Jan. 28, Friday

@STR
Cs07, prepare for the oral defense tomorrow

@Physics
Be - Mg: Water Rocket for Phase 2 (Range) and last 3 teams of Na for Phase 1 will resume tomorrow... no definite schedule just look for me, Sir Reygie, and/or Sir Llags to launch your rocket... :))
- Sir Darwin

@STR
Don't forget to do the requirement with your TOR Mentor.

26 January 2011

For Jan. 27, Thurs

@STR
Film Showing for those who haven't watched.

@Math
Intersection tomorrow.
Reps are Isaiah, JJ, Ryan

@Chem
ATOM Family Intersection Chem Quiz
THIS IS CONSIDERED A LONG TEST. THE SCORE WE GET WILL BE FOR THE WHOLE CLASS, SO PLEASE REVIEW ALL CHEM2 TOPICS!
Easy: 4, 5, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 27, 29, 30
Average: 1, 2, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 18, 23, 28
Difficult: 3, 6, 8, 10, 16, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26

@Physics
Water Rockets tomorrow.
Don't forget, the two stations are longest time and longest range. The higher score you get among the stations will be your score for the activity.
Just presenting a finished rocket will earn you a passing grade of 18 over 30.

@Chem
Setting up of exhibits (?). May visiting schools pa rin e.

@Letter
JR, CJ, Isaiah, Rajah, Dave, Carl, Eunice, Regine:
Please get your letter from Red

@STR
You must meet with your TOR Mentor. Required output due 3rd meeting next week.

Critique of an STR2 Project
Juniors, please visit the GYM, anytime this week to know which project are you assigned for the critique as well as get to know who will be your mentors. You may refer to the posted list of STR2 projects tacked at the bulletin board.

GUIDE QUESTIONS
A. Analysis of the Research Project
1. What is the real life problem being addressed by the project? State your assessment of the plausibility of the real life problem being presented by the researchers.
2. What was the major objective of the researchers? Did it address the RLP?
3. What are minor objectives of the study? Do they contribute to the accomplishment of the major objective? What significance do they play in strengthening the conclusions towards the end of the project execution?
4. Research Design
a. What are the control and experimental setups done in the study? Are they sufficient for coming up with reliable data for the project?
b. What are the independent, dependent and extraneous variables? Are they correctly identified in the research methodology? What other variables, if any, should have been included in the conduct of the research?
c. How was the data gathering procedure done? Are enough quantitative information generated? Were the procedures used for data gathering reliable? What improvements, if any, could be done in the procedure?
5. Are the conclusions made by the researchers reflective of the information generated in the research process? How well did it address the real life problem presented?

B. Presentation of the Project
1. Are the information in the poster enough to be able to understand the project without consulting with the researchers? Identify the good points and the bad points of the poster in terms of content, and suggest ways to improve the contents.
2. Are the ocntents of the poster readable? Identify the good and bad points in terms of visual effects of the poster, and suggest ways to improve the poster.
3. Were the researchers accommodating in answering questions? Did they answer the questions poased satisfactorily?

FORMAT OF SUBMISSION:
Deadline: last meeting of the week following

YMSAT week

Name/s
Section:
Title of Project being critiqued
Group Code

Researchers' Names

CRITIQUE

The critique should be in essay form, using the above as guide questions for the content. Divide the discussions into two major parts (A and B, as stated above). The discussion within each section is free style.

Submission may be handwritten or computerized, but should be 1.5 spaced, 1" margin at all sides and on bond paper of size 8.5x11". A maximum of three (3) pages is allowed.


++
TOR MENTORING PROGRAM
The Third Order Research (TOR) Mentoring Program was designed to enable the Juniors to link up with the seniors and share their experiences and knowledge gained from their respective STR classes.

The Juniors will experience giving a poster presentation to the seniods, while the seniors will have to analyze and evaluate the presentation, as well as the project. Together, the TOR Mentors and the TOR Mentees would examine the project proposal presented, and assess how the basic principles of research design are applied. Suggestions should be made by the Mentors, and shared with the Mentees.

The Seniors should explain their project to the Juniors, and share their experiences to the Juniors as well.

--Requirements here are for the seniors only.

25 January 2011

For Jan. 26, Wed

@Chem
Set up the exhibits again (laptops, etc) for the visiting schools.

@STR
View 4th years' STR projects at the gym.
I think dito ung may partner kang 4th year group tapos critique each other's project

@Letter
Sir Erin gave me a letter with a reply slip that needs to be passed.
Claim your letters from Red.

@Reply Slip of the report card
Please give to me or sir erin asap!

@Physics
Batch 2012: Water Rocket Testing tomorrow @ 11am-12pm and 2pm-3pm

24 January 2011

For Jan. 25, Tuesday

@Chem
Bring a laptop (with a permit). Kahit bukas na lang magpasign kay maam.
1 per group.
Set up at SHB 105.
Prepare 6 copies of the pamphlet for judging.

@STR
Sign up at the corkboard outside the STR room if you haven't for the film showing. It's required.

@Bio
2nd showing of the film tomorrow. Last showing.

The paper about the movie is due on Feb. 4. There are guide questions to be found upon registration when you watch.

@Physics
Rocket testing tomorrow while the 1st years are kite flying.